Vegetarianism

We (humans) are all too often emphasizing that we are superior to the other “real” animals because we have a consciousness. Yet people often say, when I mention that I eat vegetarian food, that animals also eat other animals. That is true, but here we do equate humans with other animals.

Humans are the only species that can ask questions about morality and other important themes when eating other animals because we are aware of ourselves and the world. That makes us the only species who can decide not to do this, also because other animals cannot go to the supermarket to get a meat substitute. In addition, we cannot kill each other (other people), if we do, we will be punished. With other animals this is not the case, in their lives something like that simply passes. Does that mean that our system cannot exist because all other animals do it differently? Of course not, because we are simply different. And we remain different when we talk about vegetarianism.

*Of course I do not oblige anyone to eat vegetarian food, but I do think that people can only judge vegetarianism with the full picture in mind. *

Quotes (on idealism) to think about

“Scratch any cynic and you will find a disappointed idealist.”

– George Carlin

“…After all, the chief business of the American people is business. They are profoundly concerned with producing, buying, selling, investing and prospering in the world. I am strongly of the opinion that the great majority of people will always find these are the moving impulses of our life. But it is only those who do not understand our people, who believe that our national life is entirely absorbed by material motives. We make no concealment of the fact that we want wealth, but there are many other things that we want much more. We want peace and honor, and that charity which is so strong an element of all civilization. The chief ideal of the American people is idealism.”

– Calvin Coolidge

“If you belong to the capitalist world system, material wealth is the starting point of life. The more money, the easier it is to penetrate a person’s heart. With idealism, which considers love and sentimental feelings to be the goal of life, it is hardly possible to achieve happiness, which is rooted in the material world.”

– Elmar Hussein

“There is a spark of idealism within every individual which can be fanned into flame and bring forth extraordinary results.”

– Louis D. Brandeis

“It is through the idealism of youth that man catches sight of truth, and in that idealism he possesses a wealth which he must never exchange for anything else.”

– Albert Schweitzer

“Why do we call all our generous ideas illusions, and the mean ones truths?”

– Edith Wharton, The House of Mirth

“Once people said: Give me liberty or give me death. Now they say: Make me a slave, just pay me enough.”

– Todd Garlington

“Yet here was Morrie talking with the wonder of our college years, as if I’d simply been on a long vacation.
..I once promised I would never work for money, that I would join the Peace Corps, that I would live in beautiful, inspirational places.”

– Mitch Albom, Tuesdays with Morrie

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6900.Tuesdays_with_Morrie

= Highly recommended!

“I’m restless. My whole generation is restless. I’m sick of a system where the richest man gets the most beautiful girl if he wants her, where the artist without an income has to sell his talents to a button manufacturer. Even if I had no talents I’d not be content to work ten years, condemned either to celibacy or a furtive indulgence, to give some man’s son an automobile.”

– F. Scott Fitzgerald

Sylvia Plath: poetry with the intensity of her soul

While I was reading “Jij zegt het” from Connie Palmen, I became interested in one of the main characters, named Sylvia Plath. She intrigued me and I became curious in her own life story. I searched her on Google and came across “The Bell Jar”, her only novel, mostly autobiographical. Despite the fact that it was a dark book, I found it very interesting to read. Her states of mind (always extremes) keep you busy as a reader and make you think. In the meantime I also went to the library to take a book with poems of her because in her book it is often about poetry. Besides, she is now one of the most read English-language poets. Posthumously her poetry collection “Ariel” received the Pulitzer Prize.


I love her poetry because she makes a lot of associations between things where the similarity isn’t always clear. This is confusing but it also makes it fascinating. You can think about the meaning she had in mind and you can make your own interpretations.

Third paragraph: she makes a comparison between herself and the cloud.

My interpretation:

She now brings a child into the world on which she has a lot of influence, but gradually her influence will also fade away. Perhaps she wants this in a certain way, as a proof to herself that she ultimately doesn’t matter. Both (the cloud and poet) do not deserve the name “mother”, because they do not contribute anything.

It is an asset to know her life story while reading the poems because that makes it easier to understand what she means.


Interested?

Amnesty International: because all human have rights

Amnesty International is an organization that fights for compliance with human rights around the whole world. Active since 1977, this association is already gone through many years of petitions, letter writing campaigns, protests and trying to raise awareness. And this commitment pays off, one third of the actions result in an (immediate) release of an unjustly convicted person or the ultimate respect for the human rights that were violated.

But to be able to continue putting pressure on the authorities, as many people as possible need to contribute in one way or another. Whether you sign a petition, write a letter or take action in a different way, everything helps to prevent or fight injustice.


For more information and/or for taking action, see:

Amnesty International through the years?

Watch this video:

Because some people apparently have no feelings

I want to talk today about people experiencing traumatic event after traumatic event. People who no longer have a house or property. People who lose loved ones overnight. People who have seen things that no one should ever see. People who have insufficient food and drink at their disposal. People who cross the road to a better life on a rickety boat, taking the risk of dying. People who end up in an unknown environment and have lost everything. People who discover that once in another country, a long road with many obstacles is waiting for them.

When you read the foregoing, dear unique person, this may have already given rise to certain feelings. I am sure we all have feelings. Everyone feels good in certain situations and doesn’t in others. Everyone is sometimes happy, sad, angry or scared. I would therefore ask you to allow your feelings while reading this argument. And not only that, I would also like to ask you to realize that all people have feelings and to read my further argument with this knowledge.

I want to talk about refugees. The newspaper is full of articles about refugees and almost everyone has an opinion about the policy we should pursue in this regard. I often read stories about refugees who die at sea. Refugee camps where existence is so inhumane that it barely surpasses their terrible situation from before in terms of quality of life. I hear views from all sides about what we should do with this, and it is not uncommon for people to think that we should not receive refugees because we cannot receive them. I have often heard that they just come here to benefit from us.

Because I was very curious about the story of the refugees themselves and because I found these views very hard and short-sighted, I watched several documentaries and searched for articles where refugees or people who are closely involved with them spoke for themselves . From this research I decided that the refugee problem is very complex and that people who are doing well often do not want to realize that there are people who have a harder time. That may also make sense, because then it is much easier to say that they are not allowed in our country. In the following paragraphs I want to outline their difficult situation and try to explain why you can say a lot about the refugee crisis, but not that it’s the fault of the refugees. I also want to argue for a more humane refugee policy.

A while ago I saw a documentary about a computer scientist who had participated in a demonstration and was subsequently forced by the regime of his country to leave the country within a week. Because he thought it was important to show people all over the world what such a journey with a rickety boat meant, he bought a waterproof camera before he left his country and filmed his entire trip. I hope you believe me when I say those images were terrible. For days he sat with dozens of other people on a small, unstable boat. Everyone and everything smelled of urine and vomit. Adults and especially children became weaker and many became very ill. In the end they were lucky that they were saved by a lifeboat. Unfortunately, the misery was not over after that. Several of these people were followed the following months. Almost everyone suffered from loneliness, the difficult asylum procedures, a sense of loss, a sense of uselessness and the urge to work while this was not allowed. Not only in this documentary, but also in almost all other articles and documentaries, these situations and problems came back.

People don’t want to flee. Leaving your familiar environment, taking the risk of dying, living in urine and vomit for days to feel as if everything has been lost and to experience indifference from people in a well-developed country, aren’t things that you do when there isn’t a big problem. The man in the documentary had to flee, but many others have no other choice either. If you can die at any moment in a country where the war is raging and you see your children suffering, you are also obliged to flee. If we are honest and look at the facts, we all know that we would do exactly the same.

Now you might think that we almost never leave refugees to their ill fate, because there are many refugee camps, for example in Calais. Of course, a number of things are needed for a decent human life. Decent shelter, adequate food and drink, safety and also psychological help are desirable after dozens of traumatic events. I think we can agree that these are really basic needs. Perhaps it would be useful to discuss the presence or absence of these needs in Calais piece by piece.

Of course I do not know what you mean by ‘decent’ shelter, but we can say that tents with sails that barely stop the cold and rain and where people have to sleep with more than double the capacity aren’t decent. I think you can agree on that. Food and drink are available, but in small quantities and the rows behind the posts that provide food, are endless. In one of the articles a father says that he never lets his children walk around alone in the refugee camp, there is far too much chance that something will happen to them. Calais therefore does not score well in terms of safety either. Finally, psychological help is an immense problem. A journalist spoke to parents who were close to despair. Their daughter was traumatized in Syria for life by the actions of the IS fighters. She was raped and saw the most horrible things. The parents are afraid that their daughter will never get over this again, so psychological help is absolutely necessary. Although children and adults in Belgium can count on psychological help, these traumatized children are left to their own devices. Talking to a social worker is often not possible.

Two of my friends recently participated in a project that took them across Europe to visit refugee camps. They told about a place in Belgium where refugees pitch their tents because they are not welcome anywhere else. Because this is not allowed, their sleeping bags and tents are destroyed by the police every week. I understand that this is not allowed, but those people just couldn’t go anywhere else. Sleeping there was their only option.

It isn’t long ago that many Belgians were refugees themselves. During the First World War, a significant part of the Belgian population fled to neighbouring countries (or beyond). They often were received in a humane way. The neighbouring countries, for example, offered basic aid. It is correct that we didn’t fled to countries far away from Belgium, but 85 percent of the refugees now are taken care of in neighbouring areas. Only a small part flees further for various reasons, one of which is the sometimes distressing situation in reception camps in areas close to their home country.

Of course, tensions also emerged between the local population and the Belgian population during the First World War, but there was still a lot of solidarity. This means that we can  learn a lot from our great-grandparents. I think it’s important to realize that anyone can become a refugee, you just have to have bad luck. Being punished for being born in a wrong country is ridiculous, and yet we often do not want to help people who were born in such a wrong country.

I know that refugee policy is very complex. A possible counter argument for a more humane policy (by which we help more people) could be that we should be able to do it financially. Of course I understand this and I also don’t think we can receive all refugees in Belgium. But with other European countries, for example, we could develop a fair system in which we all contribute to capacity and financial opportunities. I know this doesn’t solve everything and I don’t think there is a ready-made solution, but I think we should at least view all people as unique persons with feelings. Only in this way can we guarantee a decent life for all people.

I now have finished my arguments. I think we should remember that almost all refugees come from an untenable and terrible situation. That no one likes to leave their familiar environment and flee, so neither do refugees. That their journey to another country is often very inhumane, and that many people die in this trip. That, once they have arrived at their destination, they still have to take a bumpy and difficult road through refugee camps, asylum procedures and a lot of incomprehension. That, despite everything, we often leave these desperate people to their own devices. That it can also be done differently.

Dear unique person, I hope that you have a beautiful life and that it will stay as beautiful. I really hope so. But I also hope that if you have a beautiful life, you do realize that not everyone is that lucky, but that we are all unique people. Each refugee comes from a family and group of friends. Every refugee has a unique personality and a unique story. All people deserve a home and a life without too much suffering. Because to be honest, you do wish this as well for you and your loved ones, isn’t it?

Me, you and we: the power of empathy and support

Why are empathy, acceptance and support actually needed? Why does society have to invest in these standards and make them (back) important values? Many people do not feel supported in today’s society. People with a different culture, sexual orientation, etc. are almost routinely excluded due to the fact that their culture/behaviour is unknown to “normal” (= closest to the average) people. (= neophobia)


As I mentioned in a previous blog post, doubts about the meaning and nature of life can be positive to get through the logical need for freedom. I also said that this required courage. But this is not the only essential, support is also important. Even the “strongest” person will not be able to fully utilize his * freedom without support because other people condemn him for his path of life or take measures that limit his freedom. So it is indeed necessary that society changes and that we shift the focus (back) to humanity and connectedness, instead of individual interest and exclusion. Ultimately, this has the most beneficial effect for every individual, because we all need each other.


I, for example, experience a lack of support with regard to existence. The uncertainties and unpredictabilities of life are a challenge for human who want to understand and control everything. In the light of the universe, every person is extremely small and that’s why, in my opinion, all human (a numerically still negligible species) should work together as much as possible. Everything becomes easier with understanding and support, also living with existential difficulties. Security is an excellent antidote to existential fear. As an expert by experience I am firmly convinced of this proposition.





*For ease of reading, I speak of him or his (masculine pronouns) in this blog post, of course women or others are meant equally well.

What to do?

Want to know more about effective altruism?
By this term we mean charity that maximizes the improvement of the circumstances of the targeted audience.
Some websites:
https://eavlaanderen.org/
https://app.effectivealtruism.org/donations/new/organizations

Donate according to the principle of effective altruism?
When you are looking for the most effective charities, I advise you to take an alternative on these websites:
https://www.givewell.org/charities/top-charities
https://www.thelifeyoucansave.org/best-charities
https://animalcharityevaluators.org/donation-advice/recommended-charities/

Volunteering, something for you?
For European youth there is a solidarity corps organized by the European Union. Organizations can register on the list of the corps when they look for volunteers and volunteers can enter into the corps to participate in a project. The offer consists of a mixture of domain specific projects, where you will find social, ecological and physical volunteer work. The major advantage of the corps is that it is free: your trip to the project, your stay and your meals are reimbursed.
The website:
https://europa.eu/youth/solidarity_en

The human condition of searching for meaning

Meaning is something difficult. We, as human, see it as an important subject, but we create that importance by ourselves.  It seems that searching for meaning is part of being human, that it’s in our DNA.  Perhaps it is an evolutionary protection mechanism or just an accidental spur of our human intelligence or our consciousness.

As a result, we make that question a question worth asking. We think there may be a God, but why don’t we think there is a big brain in a barrel full of water which creates the whole world in his mind? With the whole big picture of the universe in our mind (not just our human picture of the world), we have to admit that it’s both as likely as possible.

Therefore the existence of meaning or a God, is highly uncertain. Maybe it’s a stupid question, if we would know everything about the universe and existence, maybe unimportant or maybe the biggest and best question. We are human, we are restricted, we don’t know.

Meaning of life and freedom

I don’t know if doubt about the meaning of life is the best situation we can find ourselves in. But I think life consists of doubt, nothing is certain, so we are in this situation. Yet this can be liveable because there is hope. Freedom is also an important offshoot of doubt and this can provide satisfaction with the activities and goals that you have chosen yourself.

Although I certainly do not want to deny that freedom is relative in our society. We can choose what we do, but within the lines of the world that society has created for us. So I think it is only logical that people are sometimes disappointed. They cannot do what they want and are encouraged to live as the values ​​and norms of our society indicate. Withdraw yourself from this is a possibility, but it is difficult and you will have to give up certain things as an individual. Meaninglessness and dissatisfaction can arise quickly.

We are told that we have to live this way and not differently and at the same time we also realize that we cannot understand life, so nothing is certain. And yet it is certain that I must have a family and be successful and happy. The epitome of absurdity in other words.

I think that each individual must decide for him- or herself what his / her life makes meaningful and what he / she likes to do. Society must also grant its people this freedom. In this way we put an end to the undesirable reality in which people are being pushed in fixed directions and we point to the subjectivity of what is ‘successful and good’. People then can choose freely and create their own values ​​and goals. Only when people can choose this by themselves, they really perceive the meaning of their activities. In this way, a form of meaning is created, not an all-embracing and universal meaning, but our personal meaning with unique creations and satisfaction as a result.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started